Statistical Consultation Line: (865) 742-7731
Accredited Professional Statistician For Hire
  • Contact Form

Patent for Research Engineer

7/28/2015

0 Comments

 

Patent for Research Engineer

Protecting research and statistical dreams

Hello everyone! I have been away for awhile and am glad to be back. I have been cranking out 93 pages worth of a non-provisional patent for Research Engineer. I filed provisionally last year and after over 1.3 million hits in the first year, I decided the time, effort, and money was worth it!

Thank you for your interest and use of Research Engineer over the past year! I have a laundry list of things to add to the website and will be posting more regularly now that this patent application is completed! Wish me luck!

Check out the site!

-Dr. H

Scale, LLC
0 Comments

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and inter-rater reliability

5/6/2015

0 Comments

 

Inter-rater reliability with continuous ratings

Two or more raters giving multiple continuous ratings

The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a measure of inter-rater reliability that is used when two or more raters give ratings at a continuous level.  There are two factors that dictate what type of ICC model should be used in a given study.

1.  Will the raters given ratings for all observations?

2.  Are the raters a sample from the overall population or are the raters the only people in the population?

When raters do not give ratings on all observations (i.e. three ratings are given from a random sampling of three raters out of a possible six independent raters), then the One-Way Random model is used.

When raters give ratings for all observations (i.e. three ratings are given from three raters from the overall population for each observation), then the Two-Way Random model is used.

When raters give ratings for all observations and the raters are the only valid members of the population (i.e. three ratings are given from the most esteemed scholars in an area), then the Two-Way Mixed model is used.

Scale, LLC
0 Comments

Between-subjects statistics are used to compare independent groups

5/6/2015

1 Comment

 

Comparison of independent groups on an outcome

Number of groups, scales of measurement, and meeting statistical assumptions

Between-subjects statistics are used when comparing independent groups on an outcome. Independent groups means that the groups are "different" or "independent" from each other according to some characteristic. With between-subjects designs, participants can only be part of one group (independence) and only observed once (independence of observations, IOO).

One chooses a between-subjects statistical test based on the following:

1. Number of independent groups being compared (one group, two groups, or three or more groups)

2. Scale of measurement of the outcome (categorical, ordinal, or continuous)

3. Meeting statistical assumptions (independence of observations, normality, and homogeneity of variance)

Here is a list of between-subjects statistical tests and when they are utilized in applied quantitative research:

1. Chi-square Goodness-of-fit - One group, categorical outcome, a priori hypothesis for dispersal of outcome

2. One-sample median test - One group, ordinal outcome, a priori hypothesis for median value

3. One-sample t-test - One group, continuous outcome, meet the assumption of IOO and normality, a priori hypothesis for mean value

4. Chi-square - Two independent groups, categorical outcome, and chi-square assumption (more than five observations in each cell)

5. Fisher's Exact test - Two independent groups, categorical outcome, and when the chi-square assumption is not met

6. Mann-Whitney U - Two independent groups, ordinal outcome, and when the assumption of homogeneity of variance for independent samples t-test is violated

7. Independent samples t-test - Two independent groups, continuous outcome, meet the assumption of IOO, normality (skewness and kurtosis statistics), and homogeneity of variance (also known as homoscedasticity, tested with Levene's test)

8. Unadjusted odds ratio - Three or more independent groups, categorical outcome, chi-square assumption, choose a reference category and compare each independent group to the reference

9. Kruskal-Wallis - Three or more independent groups, ordinal outcome, and when the assumption of homogeneity of variance is violated

10. ANOVA - Three or more independent groups, continuous outcome, meet the assumption of IOO, normality, and homogeneity of variance

Scale, LLC

1 Comment

New pages for sampling, variables, descriptive statistics, and regression in Research Engineer

4/24/2015

0 Comments

 

Descriptive statistics, sampling methods, and variables

Keeping content fresh

Check out the following new pages in Research Engineer!
​
Mean
Median
Mode
Variance
Standard deviation
Interquartile range
Simple random sampling
Stratified random sampling
Clustered random sampling
Purposive sampling
Convenience sampling
Nominal variables
Interval variables
Ratio variables
Count variables
Hierarchical regression

Scale, LLC
0 Comments

Non-Inferiority Trial Calculator

4/21/2015

0 Comments

 

Non-inferior means "just as good"

Easy to use non-inferiority calculator

As promised, a new non-inferiority trial calculator has been published in Research Engineer. Go the Non-Inferiority Trial or Calculators page to download it for free. Thank you!

Also, check out the flyers that we are going to start giving out! Thoughts?

Scale, LLC
0 Comments

Equivalency Trial Calculator

4/20/2015

0 Comments

 

The elusive equivalency concept is now user-friendly

Download a free equivalency trial calculator

A new Equivalency Trial Calculator for both categorical and continuous outcomes is now available in Research Engineer! Check it out on both the Equivalency Trial page and the Calculators page. Non-inferiority calculator to come!  

Scale, LLC
0 Comments

Sitemap and Search now available in Research Engineer

4/14/2015

0 Comments

 

Navigation and "healthy" information

Sitemap and Search capabilities now available

A new Sitemap is available for navigating the 334 webpages of Research Engineer.

A new Search page has been implemented as well.

Thank you for your continued support of Research Engineer!

-EH

Scale, LLC

0 Comments

Basic principles of correlational research

4/11/2015

1 Comment

 

Spearman's rho vs. Pearson's r

Bivariate associations between variables

Surveys and the outcomes they generate are oftentimes not able to meet the assumption of normality, as per skewness and kurtosis statistics.  Also, some types of variables are just naturally skewed (i.e. income, length of stay at a hospital), and thus require the use of non-parametric statistics.

Spearman's rho correlation is considered non-parametric because it is the correlational test used when finding the association between two variables measured at an ordinal level.  Ordinal level measurement does not possess a "true zero" and therefore cannot possess the precision and accuracy of continuous variables.

Pearson's r is used when correlating two continuous variables.  However, one MUST check for the assumption of normality and identify and make decisions about any outliers (observations more than 3.29 standard deviations away from the mean).  This is of PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE because correlations are highly influenced by outlying observations.  Just ONE outlier can artifically skew a correlation positively or negatively, and in a statistically significant fashion!

Going back to the introduction, remember to use Spearman's rho on interval and ordinal variables as well as with variables that are naturally skewed.  Statistics, in and of itself as a science, is very flawed.  Not everything you come across in existence will fit the normal curve.  Luckily, we have non-parametric statistics that are robust to these common violations of inferential statistical tests.

Scale, LLC
1 Comment

Copyright for Research Engineer

4/6/2015

0 Comments

 

Copyright protection for Research Engineer has been acquired

All rights reserved for Research Engineer!

Hello dear friends and patrons! Thank you so much for your interest in the website! We now have a copyright for Research Engineer! It feels so great to type and highlight "c" and hold down "alt-0-1-6-9" for the site! Check it out in the footer below!

Fighting out of Knoxville, TN,

EH

Scale, LLC
0 Comments

Sensitivity and specificity

4/4/2015

0 Comments

 

Diagnostic testing

Detecting disease versus identifying the healthy

Sensitivity and specificity are important diagnostic measures that provide evidence of a diagnostic test's ability to either "detect disease" or "identify the healthy," depending upon the clinical context.

In order to conduct diagnostic testing, the results of the diagnostic test of interest have to be compared to the results of existing "gold standard" method of diagnosis in a defined population. The results of both the diagnostic test and "gold standard" have to be quantified as a dichotomous categorical variable (positive or negative, "+" or "-").   

Sensitivity is the ability of a diagnostic test to detect disease. It is the percentage of people that tested positive or "+" with both the diagnostic test and the "gold standard." A diagnostic test with high sensitivity is good at picking up cases of a given disease state. It is also able to "rule out" disease states.

Specificity is the ability of a diagnostic test to identify the healthy. It is the percentage of people that tested negative or "-" with both the diagnostic test and the "gold standard." A diagnostic test with high specificity is good at detecting cases that do not require more intensive treatment. It is also able to "rule in" disease states.

It is optimal to have a diagnostic test that can both detect disease (sensitivity) AND identify the healthy (specificity). There is an absolute inverse relationship between sensitivity and specificity. As sensitivity goes up, specificity will go down. Higher specificity will lead to lower sensitivity. A well-accepted criterion for a balanced diagnostic test is 80% for both sensitivity and specificity. However, given the clinical context, a certain type of diagnostic test with either higher sensitivity or specificity may be warranted.  

If the diagnostic test results are measured along a numerical continuum, then receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves can be plotted to detect what value maximizes both sensitivity and specificity. ROC curves can also be used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of several tests concurrently and comparing area under the curve (AUC).
    

Scale, LLC
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Archives

    March 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014

    Author

    Eric Heidel, Ph.D. is Owner and Operator of Scalë, LLC.

    Categories

    All
    95% Confidence Interval
    Absolute Risk Reduction
    Accuracy
    Acquiring Clinical Evidence
    Adjusted Odds Ratio
    Affordable Care Act
    Alpha Value
    ANCOVA Test
    ANOVA Test
    Applying Clinical Evidence
    Appraisal Of The Literature
    Appraising Clinical Evidence
    A Priori
    Area Under The Curve
    Asking Clinical Questions
    Assessing Clinical Practice
    AUC
    Basic Science
    Beta Value
    Between-subjects
    Biserial
    Blinding
    Bloom's Taxonomy
    Bonferroni
    Boolean Operators
    Calculator
    Case-control Design
    Case Series
    Categorical
    Causal Effects
    Chi-square
    Chi-square Assumption
    Chi-square Goodness-of-fit
    Classical Test Theory
    Clinical Pathways
    Clustered Random Sampling
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Cochran's Q Test
    Coefficient Of Determination
    Cognitive Dissonance
    Cohort
    Comparative Effectiveness Research
    Comparator
    Concurrent Validity
    Confidence Interval
    Confirmatory Factor Analysis
    Construct Specification
    Construct Validity
    Continuous
    Control Event Rate
    Convenience Sampling Method
    Convergent Validity
    Copyright
    Correlations
    Count Variables
    Cox Regression
    Cronbach's Alpha
    Cross-sectional
    Curriculum Vitae
    Database Management
    Diagnostic Testing
    EBM
    Education
    Effect Size
    Empirical Literature
    Epidemiology
    Equivalency Trial
    Eric Heidel
    Evidence-based Medicine
    Exclusion Criteria
    Experimental Designs
    Experimental Event Rate
    Facebook
    Factorial ANOVA
    Feasible Research Questions
    FINER
    Fisher's Exact Tests
    Friedman's ANOVA
    Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
    "gold Standard" Outcome
    G*Power
    Guidelines For Authors
    Hazard Ratio
    Hierarchical Regression
    Homogeneity Of Variance
    Hypothesis Testing
    ICC
    Incidence
    Inclusion Criteria
    Independence Of Observations Assumption
    Independent Samples T-test
    Intention-to-treat
    Internal Consistency Reliability
    Interquartile Range
    Inter-rater Reliability
    Interval Variables
    Intervention
    Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
    Isomorphism
    Item Response Theory
    Kaplan-Meier Curve
    Kappa Statistic
    KR-20
    Kruskal-Wallis
    Kurtosis
    Levene's Test
    Likert Scales
    Linearity
    Listwise Deletion
    Logarithmic Transformations
    Logistic Regression
    Log-Rank Test
    Longitudinal Data
    MANCOVA
    Mann-Whitney U
    MANOVA
    Mass Emails In Survey Research
    Math
    Mauchly's Test
    McNemar's Test
    Mean
    Measurement
    Median
    Medicine
    Merging Databases
    Missing Data
    Mode
    Multinomial Logistic Regression
    Multiple Regression
    Multivariate Statistics
    Negative Binomial Regression
    Negative Predictive Value
    Nominal Variables
    Nonequivalent Control Group Design
    Non-inferiority
    Non-inferiority Trial
    Non-parametric Statistics
    Non-probability Sampling
    Normality
    Normality Of Difference Scores
    Normal Probability Plot
    Novel Research Question
    Number Needed To Treat
    Observational Research
    Odds Ratio With 95% CI
    One-sample Median Tests
    One-sample T-test
    One-sided Hypothesis
    One-Way Random
    Operationalization
    Ordinal
    Outcome
    Outliers
    Parametric Statistics
    Pearson's R
    Ph.D.
    Phi Coefficient
    PICO
    Pilot Study
    Point Biserial
    Poisson Regression
    Population
    Positive Predictive Value
    Post Hoc
    Post-positivism
    PPACA
    PPV
    Precision
    Predictive Validity
    Prevalence
    Principal Components Analysis
    Probability Sampling
    Propensity Score Matching
    Proportion
    Proportional Odds Regression
    Prospective Cohort
    Psychometrics
    Psychometric Tests
    Publication
    Publication Bias
    Purposive Sampling
    P-value
    Random Assignment
    Randomized Controlled Trial
    Random Selection
    Rank Biserial
    Ratio Variables
    Receiver Operator Characteristic
    Regression
    Regression Analysis
    Relative Risk
    Relevant Research Question
    Reliability
    Repeated-measures ANOVA
    Repeated-measures T-test
    Research
    Research Design
    Research Engineer
    Research Journal
    Research Question
    Residual Analysis
    Retrospective Cohort
    ROC Curve
    Sample Size
    Sampling
    Sampling Error
    Sampling Method
    Scales Of Measurement
    Science
    Search Engine
    Search Query
    Sensitivity
    Simple Random Sampling
    Sitemap
    Skewness
    Social Science
    Spearman-Brown
    Spearman's Rho
    Specificity
    Specificity In Literature Searching
    Sphericity Assumption
    Split-half Reliability
    SPSS
    Standard Deviation
    Standards Of Care
    Statistical Analysis
    Statistical Assumptions
    Statistical Consultation
    Statistical Power
    Statistical Power Analysis
    Statistical-power-test
    Statistician
    Statistics
    Stratified Random Sampling
    Survey
    Survey Construct Specification
    Survey Methods
    Systematic Review
    Test-Retest Reliability
    Twitter
    Two-sided Hypothesis
    Two-Way Mixed
    Two-Way Random
    Type I Error
    Type II Error
    Unadjusted Odds Ratio
    Validity
    Variables
    Variance
    Wilcoxon
    Within-subjects
    YouTube


    Contact Form

Contact Dr. Eric Heidel
[email protected]
(865) 742-7731

Copyright © 2024 Scalë. All Rights Reserved. Patent Pending.